Chapter
39
Jackie
Shellborne
I suggest that morphogenetic fields work by
imposing patterns on otherwise random or indeterminate patterns of activity.
For example they cause microtubules to crystallize in one part of the cell rather
than another, even though the subunits from which they are made are present
throughout the cell.
Morphogenetic fields are not fixed forever, but evolve. The fields of Afghan hounds and poodles have become different from those of their common ancestors, wolves. How are these fields inherited? I propose that that they are transmitted from past members of the species through a kind of non-local resonance, called morphic resonance. – Rupert Shelldrake
Morphogenetic fields are not fixed forever, but evolve. The fields of Afghan hounds and poodles have become different from those of their common ancestors, wolves. How are these fields inherited? I propose that that they are transmitted from past members of the species through a kind of non-local resonance, called morphic resonance. – Rupert Shelldrake
Jackie Shellborne was already a fellow at
Oxford, when the whole of her scientific learning felt obviously
incomplete. It was probably the failure
of the human genome project to explain in genetic terms the differences between
humans and chimpanzees. What was it her
colleague had said? ‘Based on DNA alone,
we frankly cannot explain why these two species are so fundamentally different
from each other.’
And that set her on her course to figure
out why. Why some cells within the same
organism became a brain and others became stomachs, why a poodle was different
than a wolf, where exactly the patterns of specific forms were hid if not in
the DNA. She explored the so-called dead
ends and pseudo-sciences to find clues.
Russian research showed the modern seeds grown in an electromagnetic
field grew into their primal ancestral forms.
How was this possible? She
learned that chemists and crystallographers had great difficulty in the initial
crystallization of new compounds, but afterwards they became easier to
crystallize all over the world. Absurd
theories such as crystal seeds being carried to other laboratories in chemists’
bears were readily accepted, because there was simply no alternative
theory. The further afield Jackie turned
her gaze, the more she encountered this problem, which she quickly deduced was
not simply one of biology, but one shared by all sciences.
At last, she found what she was looking
for, something all biologists had taken for granted, the teleological solution,
one dismissed as intellectual short hand, the concept of morphegenetic fields. With this in mind she turned her studies to
physics, to the realm of the quanta. What if the resonance of similarly structured
forms of quanta created fields that guided the shapes and functions of both
organs and organisms, as well as all manner of physical phenomena? What if the laws of nature itself were more
like habits? Perhaps form itself existed
as a blueprint in some Platonic manner that was inherited much like DNA, by all
similar forms that followed.
She published her first book on what she
then called Morphic Resonance, which was quickly denounced as pseudoscientific
twaddle by the establishment, prompting one critic to suggest that all copies
of the book be quickly burned. This
infuriated Jackie, and prompted her to resign her position at Oxford, and
devote herself completely to her new science of life and physics. Her second book found print in a New Age
publisher. The irony was not lost on
her. She traded barbs with her former
colleagues in the news papers and scientific press on those few occasions such
bastions of established paradigm gave her voice. She engaged in experiments with a few willing
scientists who were eager to put this ridiculous upstart theory to bed, once
and for all. In most such experiments,
Jackie felt vindicated by the results but her co-sponsors declared an
inconclusive result in unanimous manner.
It was a frustrated Jackie Shellborne,
burnt-out by the constant battle with the entrenched current paradigm, who
wrote her critique, The Flaws of the Religion of Science. This, of course, completely destroyed any
hope of resuming her academic career at any point. It was only a few weeks later, as she was
typing out an angry rebuttal to one of her former colleagues’ diatribes, that
she got the email that would change her life.
She was shocked when she saw who it was
from, the legendary Rian Jenkins, a brilliant theoretical physicist who had
vanished from academic life ten years previously, after his paper setting the
stage for what would become the Simulation Hypothesis, was ravaged by the
physicist community roundly. The subject
line made her heart jump, “I think I can help you”. She clicked on the email to open it, but that
the body of the email contained was a phone number from France. She looked at the time and quickly reached
for her telephone.
copyright 2017 Diana Hignutt
No comments:
Post a Comment